Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Community Update
Open House #3
  • Delaware County Engineer’s Office
  • January 19, 2005
2
Tonight’s Speakers
  • Scott Pike, Delaware County Engineer’s Office
  • Jeff Griffin, Burgess & Niple
  • Phil Laurien, Delaware County Regional Planning Commission
  • Steve Thieken, Burgess & Niple
3
Tonight’s Program
  • Presentation
  • Questions
  • One on one discussions at exhibit stations
4
Process Review
  • Open House #1– General Project Information and Survey (June 29, 2004)
  • Open House #2 – Presentation of Preliminary Corridors and Survey (September 29, 2004)
  • Preferred Corridor Announcement - (November 29, 2004)
5
Remaining Tasks/
Estimated Timetable
  • Open House #4 – Present feasible alignments within Preferred Corridor (March 2005)
  • Open House #5 – Present refined feasible alignment(s) (June 2005)
  • Announce Preferred Alignment (July 2005)
  • Begin construction and right of way plan preparation (August 2005)
6
Remaining Tasks/
Estimated Timetable (continued)
  • Begin right of way discussions with property owners (No earlier than August 2006)
  • Begin construction (No earlier than 2008)
  • Open Sawmill Parkway Extension (Approximately 18 months after construction begins – Mid year 2009)
7
Preferred Corridor Selection Process
  • Criteria Selection and Weighting Workshop – November 1, 2004
  • Evaluation of Alternative Corridors Workshop – November 5, 2004
  • Advisory Council Input on Highest Ranked Alternative Corridors – November 10, 2004
  • Preferred Corridor Announcement – November 29, 2004


8
Criteria Selection and Weighting Workshop
  • Participants were selected based on:
    • Diversity of background
    • Organizations they represent
    • History of involvement with project to date


  • Residents, local government, Olentangy Schools, and the Ohio Department of Transportation were represented
9
Criteria Selection and Weighting Workshop (continued)
  • Consensus of workshop participants:
    • Avoid structures representing major capital investments
    • Minimize impact on homes and businesses
    • Minimize public cost
    • Minimize environmental impacts
    • Maximize compatibility with Comprehensive Plans
    • Public Input (Open House #2 Survey)


10
Criteria Selection and Weighting Workshop (continued)
    • Criteria selected and weighted by the workshop participants were then used to rank each corridor presented at the September 29, 2004 Open House
    • This ranking was done at the Evaluation of Alternative Corridors Workshop on November 5, 2004


11
Evaluation of Alternative Corridors Workshop
  • Original four corridors were ranked
  • Nine “hybrid” corridors were also ranked
  • Hybrid corridors were determined using combinations of original four corridors
  • Corridor B and Hybrid Corridors 4 and 5 were highest ranked
  • These were presented to the Advisory Council on November 10, 2004 for input
12
Corridors
and
Corridor
Segments
13
Summary of Corridor
Evaluation
14
Advisory Council Input
  • Hybrid 4 maximizes available area west of corridor for single family residences on lot sizes of no less than 1 acre
  • Hybrid 4 minimizes available area east of corridor where somewhat higher densities might be considered
  • Hybrid 4 is consistent with current zoning and Comprehensive Plan for Liberty Township
15
Advisory Council Input (continued)
  • Within the current and projected future corporate limits of the City of Delaware, Hybrid 4 is most consistent with Delaware’s Comprehensive Plan and their plans for airport expansion
  • Corridor B has the least amount of consistency with Liberty Township and City of Delaware Comprehensive Plans
16
Advisory Council Input (continued)
  • Hybrid 4 was recommended by Advisory Council to be the Preferred Corridor
  • The Delaware County Engineer’s Office selected Hybrid 4 and the Preferred Corridor was announced on November 29, 2004
  • Report documenting entire Preferred Corridor Selection process is on project website (www.sawmillparkway.org)
17
Preferred Corridor
  • Hybrid 4 (H4)
18
Land Use
  • (Liberty Township Comprehensive Plan 1995)
19
Land Use
  • (Concord Township
  • Comprehensive
  • Plan 2004)
20
Land Use
  • (Sewer Master Plan – Revised Density Map)
21
Land Use
  • (Population
  • Projection)
22
Land Use
  • (Sewer Master Plan with Perry Taggart Service Area in Liberty)
23
Land Use
  • (Build-Out Study Concord / Liberty Township)
24
Traffic
25
Key Traffic Points
  • Significant development growth is expected for study area and surrounding area
  • Current roadway system in the study area can’t safely handle expected traffic
  • There is an opportunity to create a critical north-south linkage to provide a safe facility for future traffic
26
Future Traffic Volumes
  • 2001 Thoroughfare Plan
  • Traffic modeling for design
    • Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission

27
Land Use Analysis
  • Analysis consistent with:


  • Liberty Township Comprehensive Plan
  • Concord Township Comprehensive Plan
  • Union County Comprehensive Plan
  • City of Powell Comprehensive Plan
  • City of Delaware Comprehensive Plan
28
Planned Growth in “Influence Area”
29
Planned Growth within Study Area
30
Traffic Growth
  • Significant increases  on local road system
31
Comparative Locations
32
Comparative Locations
33
Anticipated Traffic Problems – Current System
  • Highly over capacity (gridlock conditions):
    • Liberty Road / Home Road Intersection
    • Home Road / Sawmill Parkway Intersection
  • Unsafe / difficult driveway access:
    • Traffic volumes too high on Liberty Road to provide for safe access to properties
34
Impact of SPE
  • Carries the bulk of traffic load instead of Liberty Road
  • Provides much safer route for future traffic than current system.
  • Reduces traffic load on other roadways
  • Provides a better / safer alternative for trucks
35
Impact to Total North-South Traffic
  • Parkway does not “create” traffic
  • Total N-S trips practically unchanged (2%)
  • Includes SR 745, SR 257, Section Line Road, Steitz Road, Sawmill Parkway, Liberty Road, SR 315, and US 23
36
Summary of Traffic Issues
  • The existing roadway system cannot handle the anticipated traffic growth.
  • SPE would improve north-south traffic capacity in the system.
  • SPE would provide a safe facility for north-south traffic growth.
  • The construction of SPE does not increase the total north-south traffic demand.
37
Please visit
www.sawmillparkway.org
  • For more information and for additional comments: