Open House
Survey Responses
March
22, 2005
There were a total
of 68 responses received for this survey. 49 surveys were turned in
at the Open House and 19 were received afterwards in the form of surveys
or correspondence.
1. After reviewing the feasible alternatives
for theSawmill Parkway Extension, which one do you prefer?
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| Alternate 1 |
6
|
3
|
9
|
| Alternate 2 |
2
|
6
|
8
|
| Alternate 3 |
5
|
3
|
8
|
| Alternate 4 |
14
|
6
|
20
|
2. Tonight we discussed some design parameters
for the SPE. Please indicate your opinions regarding some of those
design elements.
A. Should the entire length of the Parkway
be lighted?
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| Yes |
5
|
2
|
7
|
| No |
35
|
10
|
45
|
B. Should there be lighting only at
intersections?
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| Yes |
24
|
9
|
33
|
| No |
15
|
5
|
20
|
C. Should there be no lighting along
the Parkway?
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| Yes |
14
|
5
|
19
|
| No |
19
|
3
|
22
|
D. Should the Parkway have a bike path?
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| Yes |
34
|
11
|
45
|
| No |
10
|
4
|
14
|
If yes, should the bike path be on
one side of the Parkway or on both sides?
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| One Side |
13
|
2
|
15
|
| Both Sides |
19
|
8
|
27
|
E. Should the right-of-way for the Parkway
be expanded to accommodate varying width of median?
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| Yes |
21
|
4
|
25
|
| No |
16
|
9
|
25
|
F. Please indicate your preferences
regarding ways in which the Parkway can be screened for existing
homes and structures (check all that apply).
| |
At Open House
|
After Open House
|
Total
|
| Earth Mounds |
31
|
11
|
42
|
| Trees |
38
|
12
|
50
|
| Fencing |
8
|
3
|
11
|
| None |
1
|
0
|
1
|
Return
to Open Houses